The abstracts will be reviewed and evaluated by the Scientific Committee according to the following criteria
1. Scientific novelty: how musch similar works have been published before, how much the data in the presented study differ from those previously presented. Abstracts with more actual information will receive a higher rating
2. Are the published results of practical value?
3. Study design: whether the endpoints of the study are well defined, whether statistical methods are correctly used in assessing the results of the study.
4. Registration: is the study registered on clinicaltrials.gov or another clinical trial registration portal, is the study in the process of enrolling patients or is it already closed?
5. Grammar: assessed by how readable and grammatically correct the Thesis is
6. Relevance: how relevant and interesting are the results presented in the abstracts for the researchers participating in the conference
Accepted abstracts will not be subject to editorial revisions. In case of a positive decision of the scientific committee, the version sent by you will be published in the electronic collection of abstracts.